Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HOLDER V. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
LAUREN N. HOLDER
Defendant:
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER , WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES and WAKE FOREST BAPTIST HEALTH
Counter_claimant:
WAKE FOREST BAPTIST HEALTH , WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES and WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
Counter_defendant:
LAUREN N. HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
RATLIFF v. WAKE FOREST BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2015cv00975
Plaintiff:
LEON RATLIFF
Defendant:
WAKE FOREST BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2015cv00378
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN SMITH
Defendant:
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Leon Ratliff v. Wake Forest Baptist Med Center
as 14-1117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON RATLIFF
Defendant - Appellee:
WAKE FOREST BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
RATLIFF v. WAKE FOREST BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2013cv00991
Plaintiff:
LEON RATLIFF
Defendant:
WAKE FOREST BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS OF AMERICA, INC. v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2013cv00330
Plaintiff:
MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
