Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hall v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hall
Defendant:
BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Donald Licato, Frank Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Barlow v. US Customs Border Patrol et al
as 1:2023cv03323
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow
Defendant:
US Customs Border Patrol, Dundalk Marine Terminal, US Customs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Barlow v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv03013
Petitioner:
Joshua Barlow
Respondent:
Paige C. Jones and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schweiger v. L.T. Barlow et al
as 1:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Ian Thomas Schweiger
Defendant:
Harford County Detention Center, L.T. Barlow, Capt. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1451 Immigration: Revocation of Citizenship
McPherson et al v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00795
Defendant:
Dave Neverdon, Frank Barlow, Baltimore Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McPherson and Eric Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv00698
Defendant:
Frank Barlow, Baltimore Police Department, Daniel Boone and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome L Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barlow v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02428
Plaintiff:
James Barlow
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barlow v. Jeter et al
as 8:2017cv00871
Plaintiff:
Joshua Barlow
Defendant:
A. Jeter and Mary Lou McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. McDonough (Director/Warden)
as 8:2016cv03830
Plaintiff:
Joshua Barlow
Defendant:
Mary Lou McDonough (Director/Warden)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
