Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Guichard v. McCormack Baron Management, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Giovanni A Guichard
Defendant:
McComack Baron Management Inc and McCormack Baron Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Baron v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
Earlene Baron
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCormack Baron Salazar, Inc. et al v. USI Insurance Services LLC
as 4:2021cv00993
Plaintiff:
McCormack Baron Salazar, Inc. and McCormack Baron Management, Inc.
Defendant:
USI Insurance Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolman v. Lee Enterprises Missouri, Incorporated
as 4:2018cv01483
Plaintiff:
Baron Wolman
Defendant:
Lee Enterprises Missouri, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bates et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01111
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sterling Bates , Barton Baron , Joseph R. Bork, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baron v. Mesmer
as 4:2016cv00720
Petitioner:
Jacqueline Baron
Respondent:
Angela Mesmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Casine v. Railton Residence, LP et al
as 4:2015cv00754
Plaintiff:
Vic Casine
Defendant:
Railton Residence, LP, McCormack Baron Ragan Man. Ser, Inc., Alan Douglas Lobel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moller v. Baron et al
as 2:2014cv04064
Plaintiff:
Vance Ray Moller
Defendant:
Shawna Baron , Erin Rye and P Andrew Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv03068
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Baron Mallory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson v. Baron McCormack et al
as 4:2012cv01992
Plaintiff:
Arthur Charles Jackson
Defendant:
Baron McCormack and St. Louis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
