Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Bartow County, Georgia v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2019op45045
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bartow County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bartow County, Georgia v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv00007
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Bartow County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA USA v. BUTTS COUNTY GEORGIA, et al
as 5:2018cv00471
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, RANDOLPH COUNTY GEORGIA, SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA USA, DR MONIQUE Y TATE, LAMAR PERRYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Rau v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv05200
Defendant:
Clark Millsap, Corporal. [FNU] Crutchfield, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Cheri Rau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denver Allen v. You Tube Com, et al
as 17-14653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
YOU TUBE COM, FLOYD COUNTY GEORGIA, Jail, BARTOW COUNTY GEORGIA, Jail and others
ALLEN v. YOU TUBE COM et al
as 5:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN
Defendant:
YOU TUBE COM, FLOYD COUNTY GEORGIA, BARTOW COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. .14 acres, more or less, over parcel(s) of land of approximately 3.143 acres in Land Lots 239, 240, and 241, of the 17th Land District, 3rd Section of Bartow County, Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv03390
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
.14 acres, more or less, over parcel(s) of land of approximately 3.143 acres in Land Lots 239, 240, and 241, of the 17th Land District, 3rd Section of Bartow County, Georgia and Riverway Estates Lot Owners Association LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. 10.1824 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lots 669 and 700 of the 17th Land District and 3rd Section, of Bartow County, Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv03290
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
10.1824 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lots 669 and 700 of the 17th Land District and 3rd Section, of Bartow County, Georgia, Tim Denson , Tera Denson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. 16.14 acres and 5 additional acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 982 of the Seventeenth (17) District, Third (3rd) Section of Bartow County, Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv03296
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
16.14 acres and 5 additional acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 982 of the Seventeenth (17) District, Third (3rd) Section of Bartow County, Georgia, William G. Taff , Rebecca K. Taff and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. 20.8 acres, more or less, over the following parcel(s) of land: Approximately 49.96 acres, being a part of Land Lots 20, 53, 92 and 125 of the 17th District, 3rd Section of Bartow County, Georgia and et al
as 1:2016cv03242
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
20.8 acres, more or less, over the following parcel(s) of land: Approximately 49.96 acres, being a part of Land Lots 20, 53, 92 and 125 of the 17th District, 3rd Section of Bartow County, Georgia and, Approximately 1006.48 acres, being all of Land Lots 98, 26, 27, 28, 44, 45, 47, 48, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 120, 121, 122, 168, 169, Part of Land Lots 99, 166, 167, 192, 193, 194, 172, and 117 of the 17th, Approximately 881.41 acres, being all of Land Lots 189, 244, 262, 315, 49, 50, 51, 52, 96, 170, and 171, being a part of Land Lots 172, 173, 188, 242, 243, 245, 260, 261, 263, 314, 316, 333, 334, 335 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
