Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Hawthorne et al v. Podium Corporation
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Austin Hawthorne, Ross Mitchell, Zachary Fotis and others
Defendant:
Podium Corporation, Inc.
BAUMAN v. R&M SERVICE SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 9:2021cv80070
Defendant:
R&M SERVICE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
EMILY BAUMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation et al v. Abeyta et al
as 2:2019cv05651
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation and Pinnacle West Capital Corporation Group Life & Medical Plan
Defendant:
Bauman & Dow PC and Christopher L Abeyta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bauman v. Malabar Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00259
Defendant:
Malabar Inc and Augusto Conte
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bauman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wieck v. Synrg.Royce LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00599
Defendant:
Eric Bauman, Nathan McKinney, Dennis Royce, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Wieck
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bauman v. SC Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00928
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bauman
Defendant:
SC Maintenance, Inc. and Steven S. Clements
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bauman v. SC Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01426
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bauman
Defendant:
SC Maintenance, Inc. and Steven S. Clements
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Michael Bauman v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., et al
as 17-11709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. BAUMAN, by and through Michael E. Sumner, Conservator
Defendant - Appellee:
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN and PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., as Plan Administrator
Bauman v. JKaiser Inc et al
as 1:2016cv01330
Plaintiff:
James E Bauman
Defendant:
JKaiser Inc , Central Illinois Truss Inc and Jerry J Kaiser
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Keston Abe et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2015cv08751
Plaintiff:
Keston Abe, Francisco Acevedo, Patrick Ahern-Price and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
