Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
US v. Torres-Ruiz
as 26-1814
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: FERNANDO M. TORRES-RUIZ, a/k/a Bebo, a/k/a Fernando M. Torres-Ruiz
United States of America v. Blackledge (Anderson)
as 26-1378
Defendant: KEYEWANIE BLACKLEDGE, ABDUL ABDULLAH, CLEMENT BOATENG and others
Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Blackledge (Anderson)
as 26-1342
Defendant: KEYEWANIE BLACKLEDGE, ABDUL ABDULLAH, CLEMENT BOATENG and others
Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Aaron Bebo, Jr.
as 26-1876
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Aaron Beronica Bebo, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00475
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
US v. Negron-Perez
as 25-1927
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: EDUARDO NEGRON-PEREZ, a/k/a Bebo, t/n Eduardo Luis Negron-Perez
Acevedo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11808
Plaintiff: Norma Acevedo, Maureen Adkins, Julie Ahrens and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MMS HERITAGE INC v. SCAVIA et al
as 1:2025cv02828
Plaintiff: MMS HERITAGE INC
Defendant: MARIA ELISABETTA SCAVIA, MM WINEMAKER SA and BEBO HEALTH SA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rotondo v. McKee, et al
as 25-1743
Plaintiff: GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant: GOVERNOR DANIEL J. MCKEE, individual and official capacity, DIRECTOR WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., D.O.C. Dir., individual and official capacity, WARDEN KATHLEEN A. LYONS, Warden Med. Sec., individual and official capacity and others
Rotondo v. McKee et al
as 1:2025cv00192
Plaintiff: Gino Rotondo, Sr.
Defendant: Gov. McKee, Director Salisbury, Warden Cathy Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?