Cases 31 - 40 of 126
Ronald Parker v. Moses Jackson, III
as 14-2565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Parker
Defendant - Appellee:
Moses Jackson, III, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Digital Recognition Network Inc et al v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Digital Recognition Network Inc and Vigilant Solutions Inc
Defendant:
Mike Beebe and Dustin McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
John Wright v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 14-2148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Kirby Wright
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, Governor, Ruth Whitaker, Senator of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, Mr., Arkansas Attorney General and others
Calvin Carrick v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 14-1954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Calvin Carrick
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, In his official as Governor of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas and Larry Crane, In his official capacity as Clerk for Pulaski County
Bates v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bates
Defendant:
Mike Beebe and Mark Marton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lester v. Phelps et al
as 5:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant:
Bradford J Phelps, Marvin Evans, Jr, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ellis Brooks
Defendant:
Mike Beebe and James M Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. Beebe et al
as 2:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
John Kirby Wright
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Ruth Whitaker, Dustin McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Moody et al
as 4:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ellis Brooks
Defendant:
James M Moody, Jr, Mike Beebe, J Leon Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
