Cases 1 - 10 of 85
FBA Operating Co. v. ETN Capital, LLC
as 5:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
FBA OPERATING CO.
Defendant:
ETN Capital, LLC and ETN Capital, LLC d/b/a Beech Lane, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
FBA Operating Co. v. Beech Lane, LLC
as 3:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
FBA Operating Co.
Defendant:
Beech Lane, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
S and B Filters, Inc. v. ETN Capital, LLC
as 5:2021cv01840
Plaintiff:
S&B FILTERS, INC., a California corporation and S and B Filters, Inc.
Defendant:
ETN CAPITAL, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, d/b/a Beech Lane, ETN Capital, LLC a North Carolina limited liability company doing business as Beech Lane and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Counter Claimant:
ETN Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Pickett v. Paisley Park et al
as 1:2016cv10503
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Pickett
Defendant:
Paisley Park, Elisabeth Schoening, Jerry Auerswald and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company v. Plum PBC
as 6:2014cv00791
Plaintiff:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
Defendant:
Plum PBC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FLGOLF, INC. v. Footwear Fashions Ltd. et al
as 5:2012cv00624
Plaintiff:
FLGOLF, INC.
Defendant:
Footwear Fashions Ltd. and Scott Beech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
K-Beech, Inc. v. John Does 1-31
as 8:2012cv00088
Plaintiff:
K-Beech, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-31
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
K-Beech, Inc. v. Does 1-22
as 2:2011cv15224
Plaintiff:
K-Beech, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-22
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
K-Beech, Inc. v. Does 1-18
as 2:2011cv15226
Plaintiff:
K-Beech, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-18
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
K-BEECH, INC. v. JOHN DOE
as 2:2011cv07086
Plaintiff:
K-BEECH, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
