Cases 61 - 70 of 406
Jenkins v. Tony et al
as 7:2020cv01283
Defendant:
Officer Renolds, Alabama Department of Corrections, Warden Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Noble Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wedgeworth v. Garrett et al
as 7:2020cv01217
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, P Bradley, B Bell and others
Petitioner:
Tiffany Wedgeworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. Birmingham Board of Education et al
as 2:2020cv01200
Plaintiff:
DeKorrie K Bell
Defendant:
Carver Washington High School and Birmingham Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Motley
as 2:2020cv01194
Defendant:
Motley, Mr. Motley, CAPS Downtown Birmingham and others
Plaintiff:
Miss DeKorrie K Bell and DeKorrie K Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01141
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Ms. Bell and others
Petitioner:
Tanya L. English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Strickland v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01140
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Ms. Medley, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Bonnie Strickland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hall v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01065
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Issac, Jenkins and others
Petitioner:
Nakeisha Y Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. Etowah County Detention Center
as 4:2020cv01032
Defendant:
Etowah County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01015
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Bell, Issac and others
Petitioner:
Tiffany Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Meyers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00967
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Jenkins, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Julia Hollis Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
