Cases 11 - 20 of 278
Eaton v. Bell
as 1:2020cv00205
Petitioner:
George L. Eaton
Respondent:
J.R. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Adams et al
as 3:2020cv00144
Defendant:
Paul Adams, Department of Justice, J. R. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Harrison County Commission, Craig E. Moore and Robert Matheny
Plaintiff:
Nancy Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White Pine Insurance Company et al v. Lovejoy et al
as 2:2020cv00376
Defendant:
Matthew Bell, Jacob Hager, State Farm Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Chaney, Affordable Pre-Owned Autos, LLC and White Pine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell v. Warden
as 5:2020cv00083
Respondent:
FCI Gilmer Warden
Petitioner:
Jerome Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00265
Plaintiff:
Laura J. Bell
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Swiger et al v. A.R. Wilfley & Sons, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00117
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc., PREMIERE REFRACTORIES, INC., Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Swiger and Lyle Swiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Russell v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv00918
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Correctional Officer Schrader, Correctional Officer John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Lermon Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Maruka
as 1:2019cv00804
Respondent:
Warden C. Maruka and C. Maruka
Petitioner:
Brandon Jamar Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Corley et al v. CleaningServices.com, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
CleaningServices.com, LLC and Susan Brown
Plaintiff:
Phil Wiseman, Marguerite Bartholow, Patti Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
