Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Andres v. Town of Wheatfield
as 19-2370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elizabeth Andres, Cindy Krueger, Nicholas Coles and others
Defendant:
Roe Consolidated Holdings, individually and as Successor in interest to Frontier Chemical Process, Inc., Pyrotek Incorporated, individually and as Successor in interest to the Carborundum Company, Saint-Gobain Abrasives Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Republic Services, Inc., individualy and as Successor in interest to Niagara Sanitation Company, Inc., Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., individually and as Successor in interest to Bell Aircraft Corporation, Honeywell International Inc., individually and as Successor in interest to Bell Aerospace and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Niziol, Samantha Grawe and Mallory Niziol
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Brandon Lee Robinson v. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc et al
as 2:2017cv05709
Defendant:
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc, Bell Technical Services Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
K. R. and Brandon Lee Robinson
Vector Aerospace USA, Inc., et al v. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc., et al
as 2:2011cv01071
Plaintiff:
Vector Aerospace USA, Inc. and Vector Aerospace Helicopter Services Inc.
Defendant:
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. and Textron Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
West v. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc et al
as 6:2011mc00010
Plaintiff:
Kurt West
Defendant:
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc, Goodrich Pump & Engine Control Systems Inc and Rolls Royce Corp
BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC. v. USA
as 1:2010cv00383
Plaintiff:
BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Nobels, et al v. Associates Corp., et al
as 2:1994cv00699
Plaintiff:
LEWIS E BURNETT and VICTORIA BURNETT
Defendant:
MARATHON OIL COMPANY and BELL HELICOPTERS TEXTRON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mock v. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc
as 4:2009mc00021
Plaintiff:
Gary L Mock, Gary L Mock and Gary L Mock
Defendant:
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
