Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Manis v. Rocky Top Shine, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brandi Manis, Ben Archer and Michelle Hillmer
Defendant:
Rocky Top Shine, LLC doing business as Three Jimmy's a Good Time Eatery, LLC, James Woods Sr., James Woods Jr. and others
Gallegos et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anna Gallegos and Ben Cannon
Defendant:
Robert Smith and Saddle Creek Logistics Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Silvernagel v. Pathgroup Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01013
Plaintiff:
Sean Silvernagel
Defendant:
Pathgroup Holdings, LLC, Associated Pathologists II, P.C., Ben Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bond v. Treece et al
as 1:2022cv01113
Plaintiff:
Montario D. Bond
Defendant:
Kent Treece, Kasye Kissell, Michael Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kuilan v. Zimmermann et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jamarr Juan Kuilan
Defendant:
John C. Zimmermann, Judge Royce Taylor, Jennings Hutson Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rosario v. Cyrus et al
as 3:2021cv00922
Plaintiff:
Felicia M. Rosario
Defendant:
William Ray Cyrus, Wells Fargo Bank, U.S. Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Berrong
as 3:2021cv00301
Petitioner:
Ben Willard Watkins
Respondent:
James - Berrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
