Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Johnson v. Dentsply International, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
William Ben Johnson
Defendant:
Dentsply International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ronald Allen, Jr., et al v. Robert Smith, et al
as 13-55552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD D. ALLEN, Jr., RAYMOND BOZIGIAN, ALEXANDRA M. CASTOR and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT H. SMITH, LEROY H. MIRANDA, Jr., KILMA S. LATTIN and others
McCree v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 5:2013cv01275
Plaintiff:
Roland McCree
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg, Mayor of Pittsburg, Ben Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Jose Jesus Valadez-Gutierrez
as 1:2012cv08441
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Frank Libby , Jeffrey Isaacson and others
Defendant:
Jose Jesus Valadez-Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Allen, Jr. et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2012cv01668
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Allen, Jr. , Raymond Bozigian , Alexandra M. Castor and others
Defendant:
Robert H. Smith , Leroy H. Miranda, Jr. , Kilma S. Lattin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wilborn v. Johnson
as 6:2012cv00309
Plaintiff:
James Wilborn
Defendant:
Ben Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ben Johnson v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-20854
Petitioner - Appellant:
BEN JOHNSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Johnson v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv03710
Petitioner:
Ben Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
St. Joseph Society of Sacred Heart, Inc. v. Henry et al
as 2:2011cv01616
Defendant:
Wilmer Jacobs , Troy Henry , Daniel Davillier and others
Plaintiff:
St. Joseph Society of Sacred Heart, Inc. and William Norvel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
