Cases 1 - 10 of 46
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
Park Employees and Retirement, et alIn re: Park Employees and Retirement, et al
as 21-1386
Respondent:
RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHIE DE SILVA, BUCKS COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, SUKETU P. UPADHYAY and others
Petitioner:
BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP and In re: PARK EMPLOYEES AND RETIREMENT BOARD EMPLOYEES ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. Endo International PLC et al
as 2:2020cv06103
Plaintiff:
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Defendant:
PAUL V. CAMPANELLI, Rajiv De Silva, Suketu upadhyay and others
Pelletier et al v. Endo International PLC et al
as 2:2020cv05263
Defendant:
RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHCHIE DE SILVA, ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC, PAUL V. CAMPANELLI and others
Plaintiff:
Fernando Inzunza, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago and others
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. Endo International PLC et al
as 2:2020mc00103
Plaintiff:
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Defendant:
RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHIE DE SILVA, SUKETU P. UPADHYAY, ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. Endo International PLC et al
as 2:2020mc00102
Plaintiff:
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Defendant:
RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHIE DE SILVA, SUKETU P. UPADHYAY, ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC and others
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. Endo International PLC et al
as 1:2020cv05522
Plaintiff:
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Defendant:
Rajiv De Silva, Suketu upadhyay, Endo International PLC and others
Pelletier et al v. Endo International PLC et al
as 3:2020cv01839
Plaintiff:
Fernando Inzunza, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Alexandre Pelletier and others
Defendant:
Endo International PLC, Paul V. Campanelli, Suketu P. Upadhyay and others
International Union of Operati v. FXCM Inc.
as 18-2604
Plaintiff:
Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago and International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund, Individually and on Behalf of All others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago on Behalf of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Defendant - Appellee:
FXCM Inc., Dror Niv and Robert Lande
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
