Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gumbs v. State of New York
as 26-266
Plaintiff:
BENITO O. GUMBS and Beneto Gumbs
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, KATHLEEN HOCHUL, Chief Executive Officer/Governor, DANIEL F. MARTUSCELLO, III, Commissioner and others
Gumbs v. The State of New York
as 1:2026cv00181
Plaintiff:
Benito O. Gumbs and Beneto Gumbs
Defendant:
The State of New York, Hochul, Mr. Martuscello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gumbs v. Mrs. Lucy or Luccies et al
as 9:2025cv00988
Plaintiff:
Benito O. Gumbs and Beneto Gumbs
Defendant:
Mrs. Lucy or Luccies, Mr. Oakes, E. Marsmace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gumbs v. The State of New York
as 9:2025cv00838
Plaintiff:
Benito O. Gumbs and Beneto Gumbs
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gumbs v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2025cv00813
Plaintiff:
Benito O. Gumbs and Beneto Gumbs
Defendant:
The State of New York, Kathy Hochul, Daniel F. Martuscello, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv05095
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Ningbo Jasmine Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Zhijian Pet Products Co., Ltd., ZHOU LULU and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Gumbs v. Bell
as 19-2659
Petitioner / Appellant:
Beneto O. Gumbs
Respondent / Appellee:
E. Bell, Administration 1st Deputy Superintendent
Gumbs v. Bell
as 1:2019cv04982
Respondent:
E. Bell
Petitioner:
Beneto O. Gumbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donald Lockwood v. California Horse Racing Board et al
as 2:2016cv02964
Defendant:
Madeline Aeurbach, Madeline Aeurbach, Rick Baedeker and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Lockwood
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
