Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Doyle v. Department of Veteran Affairs
as 5:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015ct03082
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Neuse Correctional Institution, Morris Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Hending et al
as 5:2015ct03081
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
Judge Hending, Halifax County District Attorney's Office, Halifax County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Semonian et al
as 2:2010cv00317
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
Edward Semonian, His Employer City of Alexandria and Court House of Reporesintation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doyle v. Semonian
as 2:2009cv00573
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
Edward Semonian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Leftwich, Et al
as 2:2009cv00459
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
Gary F. Leftwich, Et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. State of Virginia Et Al et al
as 2:2009cv00401
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Virginia Et Al, City of Alexandria Et Al, Circuit Court Edward Simonion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Anderson et al
as 5:2009ct03130
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
Faye Anderson, Cye Grant, Capt. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Leftwich
as 2:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
Gary F. Leftwich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Leftwich
as 2:2009cv00158
Plaintiff:
Benjamin L. Doyle, Sr.
Defendant:
Gary F. Leftwich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
