Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Skyberg, Jesse v. Marske, Matthew et al
as 3:2022cv00591
Petitioner:
Jesse Skyberg
Respondent:
Warden Matthew Marske, Tiffany Roberts, Craig Klawitter and others
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martin v. Larson et al
as 0:2021cv00412
Defendant:
Lori Pykkonen, Ashley Peterson, Benjamin Rice and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Lyle Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodd v. Crandall et al
as 0:2019cv02172
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Charles Rodd
Defendant:
Dr. Benjamin Rice, Captain J. Feda, K. Crandall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Mitchell v. Jeffery Beard, et al
as 18-15632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY BEARD, BENJAMIN RICE, CDCR Senior Legal Policy Advisor, KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Dvision of Adult Institutions Director and others
Leventhal v. Tomford et al
as 0:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Leventhal
Defendant:
Travis Tomford, Victor Rigling, Rachel Mark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Beard et al
as 1:2017cv01032
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard, Benjamin Rice, Kelly Harrington and others
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2016cv01097
Plaintiff:
Duane Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
United States Of America, Suhasini N. Shah, M.D., Katherine Laybourn, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brantley v. Nickrenz et al
as 0:2016cv00746
Plaintiff:
Olan Brantley
Defendant:
Christopher Nickrenz , Benjamin Rice and Bus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Warden et al
as 0:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
William Moore
Defendant:
Warden , Benjamin Rice , Mr. Millich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiskirchen v. Piecard et al
as 0:2015cv03215
Plaintiff:
Charles Wiskirchen
Defendant:
Piecard, Resto, Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
