Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Leonard Carter, Jr. v. Henry Hudson
as 17-6632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD CARTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. A. DAVID ROBINSON, Commonwealth of Virginia Chief Corrections Operations, MR. BRYAN WATSON, Commonwealth of Virginia The Virginia Department of Corrections, MR. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commonwealth of Virginia Director for the Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Carter v. Hudson et al
as 3:2016cv00644
Plaintiff:
Leonard Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Henry E. Hudson, Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benjamin Wright v. USA
as 16-11794
Petitioner - Appellant:
BENJAMIN WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wright v. Cookson et al
as 1:2016cv00912
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Wright
Defendant:
Deputy Sherriff Cookson, GCDC Medical Department and Deputy Sherriff Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendell Helfrick v. Benjamin Wright
as 15-7889
Petitioner - Appellant:
WENDELL C. HELFRICK
Respondent - Appellee:
BENJAMIN WRIGHT, Warden, River North Correctional Center and MARK RANKIN HERRING, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia
Wright v. Thomas
as 0:2015cv03082
Petitioner:
Benjamin Wright
Respondent:
L R Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eric Terry v. Michael Henning
as 15-6706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC TERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HENNING, Nurse Practitoner, GCC, DR. VINCENT M. GORE, L. MOODY, LPN and others
Wright v. USA
as 7:2015cv00051
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Benjamin Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Michael Everage v. Benjamin Wright
as 14-7480
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE EVERAGE
Respondent - Appellee:
BENJAMIN WRIGHT, Chief Warden, Greensville Correctional Center
Wright v. Thomas
as 9:2014cv03734
Petitioner:
Benjamin Wright
Respondent:
Warden L Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
