Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Sivak v. Bennet et al
as 3:2023cv06248
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Mark J. Bennet and William A. Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Banks v. Bennet et al
as 2:2023cv05994
Plaintiff:
Rodney Banks
Defendant:
Officer Bennet, Officer Sandoval, Officer Lorenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Banks v. Officer Bennet et al
as 2:2023cv03528
Plaintiff:
Rodney Banks
Defendant:
Officer Bennet, Officer Sandoval, Officer Lorenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belcher v. Little, et al.
as 1:2023cv00013
Petitioner:
Camron Belcher
Respondent:
Brad Little, Lauren McLean, Warden Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur Edward Ezor v. Betty T. Yee et al
as 2:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Arthur Edward Ezor
Defendant:
Betty T. Yee, State Bar of California, Leah T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clarke v. Romney et al
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Mitt Romney, Tammy Baldwin, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe v. City of Concord, et al
as 22-15384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CONCORD, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, GUY SWANGER and others
Aills v. Bludworth et al
as 4:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
John W. Aills
Defendant:
Peter Bludworth, Danny York, DHO Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aills v. Bludworth et al
as 4:2021cv00090
Petitioner:
John Aills
Respondent:
Peter Bludworth, Danny York, Hearings Officer Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
