Cases 1 - 8 of 8
EXPEDITORS ASSURANCE OF VERMONT INC. v. BENNETT MOTOR EXPRESS INC.
as 1:2016cv03134
Defendant:
BENNETT MOTOR EXPRESS INC.
Plaintiff:
EXPEDITORS ASSURANCE OF VERMONT INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dedicated Transportation Systems, Inc. v. Bennett Motor Express, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Dedicated Transportation Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Bennett Motor Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Riley v. Bennett International Group et al
as 2:2014cv00739
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Riley
Defendant:
Bennett International Group , Bennett Truck Transport , Bennett Motor Express and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gonzales v. McDow, Sr. et al
as 1:2011mc00029
Plaintiff:
Christine Gonzales
Defendant:
Kennedy McDow, Sr., K&M Trucking, Bennett International Group, Inc. and others
Jarquin et al v. Featherston et al
as 8:2011cv00544
Plaintiff:
Pedro Jose Jarquin and Josecita Jarquin
Defendant:
Dickey G. Featherston and Bennett Motor Express Inc (LLC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Briggs v. Bennett Motor Express Inc et al
as 3:2008cv03877
Plaintiff:
William Briggs and William Briggs
Defendant:
Bennett Motor Express Inc, Bennett Motor Express LLC and Earl Watkins, Jr
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gonzales v. Bennett International Group, et al
as 08-2101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINE GONZALES
Defendant - Appellee:
BENNETT INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., DBA Bennett Trucking and BENNETT MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., DBA Bennett Trucking
Defendant:
KENNEDY MCDOW, SR., individually, as an Agent of Bennett Trucking, and owner of K & M Trucking and K & M TRUCKING
Christine Gonzales v. Kennedy McDow Sr., et al
as 1:2007cv00054
Plaintiff:
Christine Gonzales and Christine Gonzales
Defendant:
Kennedy McDow, Sr, K & M Trucking, Bennett International Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
