Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Salisbury, et al. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 26-7064
Plaintiff:
NELSON SALISBURY, PHILLIP ASPHY, KARL STEINBERG and others
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Gilmore-Bey v. Steiner et al
as 2:2026cv13825
Plaintiff:
Nintu Xi Gilmore-Bey
Defendant:
David Paul Steiner, Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ESTATE OF ARTHUR L. BERGMAN v. CONTINENTAL CARD SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv12943
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ARTHUR L. BERGMAN
Defendant:
CONTINENTAL CARD SERVICES, INC. and BRANDON J WARING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GILMORE-BEY v. STEINER et al
as 2:2026cv07367
Plaintiff:
NINTU XI GILMORE-BEY
Defendant:
DAVID PAUL STEINER, GRETCHEN WHITMER, DANA NESSEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bergman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01192
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Bergman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bergman v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv00441
Plaintiff:
Justin Bergman
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Vanderwal v. Bergman et al
as 1:2026cv03777
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vanderwal
Defendant:
Dave Bergman, Jennifer Hansen, Jennifer A Mix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas v. Bergman
as 1:2026cv04666
Petitioner:
Clifford D. Nicholas
Respondent:
Dave Bergman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Withers Bergman LLP v. Sharif et al
as 5:2026cv00105
Plaintiff:
Withers Bergman LLP
Defendant:
Steven Sharif and John Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Stone v. Bergman, et al
as 26-1290
Petitioner:
DALE S. STONE
Respondent:
WARDEN BERGMAN and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CDOC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
