Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Suver v. Nightingale et al
as 3:2026cv06483
Plaintiff:
Richard Suver
Defendant:
Todd Nightingale, Ronald Kisling, Aida Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv61796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bergman-Maloy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv01150
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Bergman-Maloy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Varise et al v. City of Martinez et al
as 3:2026cv04774
Plaintiff:
Brandon Varise and Flexsquare, LLC
Defendant:
City of Martinez, Jill Bergman, Mike Leontides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzales (PS) v. Bergman
as 1:2026cv02182
Petitioner:
Caine M Gonzales
Respondent:
Bergman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv61392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Moure et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04076
Plaintiff:
Allen Moure, Jr, Christina Sanchez-Portillo, Theveline St. Victor and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ANDERSON-BRAY v. MARSHALL et al
as 3:2026cv04642
Plaintiff:
LASHON ANDERSON-BRAY
Defendant:
HONORABLE ANDREA MARSHALL, HONORABLE JILL GRACE O'MALLEY, HONORABLE CHAD N. CAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Campbell (PS) v. Bergman
as 1:2026cv01786
Petitioner:
George Campbell
Respondent:
Bergman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. On Q Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv04453
Plaintiff:
Guaranteed Rate, Inc.
Defendant:
On Q Financial, LLC and John Bergman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
