Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lewis v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kyle Bernard Lewis
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00113
Petitioner:
Alden Bernard Lewis, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Alden Bernard Lewis, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Roderick Bernard Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2020cv00986
Petitioner:
Roderick Bernard Lewis
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2020cv00035
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Phil Bernard Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. United States of America
as 0:2019cv00393
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Alden Bernard Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis et al v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Corneilus Deshun Lewis , Fredrick Bernard Lewis and Janice Marie Close
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, University Of Texas Medical Branch, Yolanda Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alden Lewis, Jr. v. USA
as 17-14457
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALDEN BERNARD LEWIS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lewis v. USA
as 9:2017cv00115
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Phil Bernard Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
