Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Henderson v. Frierson et al
as 4:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
Aryee Henderson
Defendant:
Sgt. Frierson, Tonya Williams-Wallace, Melissa Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ashby v. Doyle et al
as 3:2023cv02968
Plaintiff:
Defonte Ashby
Defendant:
Robert T. Doyle, Roberto Walton and Beverly Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashby v. Woods et al
as 3:2022cv07448
Plaintiff:
Defonte Terell Ashby
Defendant:
Beverly Woods, Erin Lynch, Tony Milani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashby v. Woods et al
as 3:2022cv07445
Petitioner:
Defonte T. Ashby
Respondent:
Beverly Woods, Erin Lynch, Kim Cattreres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scruggs v. Stirling et al
as 1:2019cv00921
Defendant:
Beverly Wood, Robert Poiletman, Rubin Ridgway and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Diane Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Warden Willie Davis
as 1:2018cv02349
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Perry
Defendant:
Gilliam Psychiatric Hospital, Kennard Dubose, Terre Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Garrett v. Stirling et al
as 0:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Bernard McKie, Franklin Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Dennis et al
as 2:2018cv01011
Plaintiff:
Albert Santanieyo Kelley
Defendant:
Paul Dennis, Beverly Woods, Associate Warden Earley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slocumb v. Wood et al
as 9:2017cv01298
Plaintiff:
Conrad L Slocumb
Defendant:
Beverly Wood, Marcia Garcia, NFN Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroud v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv02892
Plaintiff:
Pamela Stroud
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bryan Stirling , Lefford Fate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
