Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Lowrance v. Bibb County DHR
as 2:2017cv00663
Plaintiff:
Holly Lowrance
Defendant:
Bibb County DHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts v. Corizon, LLC et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00646
Plaintiff:
James Charles Butts
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, David Pavlakovic, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 7:2017cv00645
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Alexander
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services and Bibb County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Bibb County Correctional Facility et al
as 7:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Nathaniel Jackson, Jr
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility, Willie Thomas, Deborah Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fikes v. Roseman et al
as 7:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Raheem Mataro Fikes
Defendant:
Roseman, Hutton and Bibb County Correctional Facility
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Alabama Department of Corrections Facility et al
as 7:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Garrett
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections Facility and Bibb County Correctional Healthcare Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Heard et al
as 7:2015cv01086
Plaintiff:
Rylee Townsend
Defendant:
Ervin Heard, Keith Hannah and Bibb County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Heard et al
as 7:2015cv00924
Plaintiff:
Susie Rosetta Walker
Defendant:
Ervin Heard and Bibb County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hallman v. Bibb County Correctional Facility et al
as 7:2014cv02315
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jamison Hallman
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility, Deborah Toney, Whitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maestas-Kaufman v. Bibb County Jail
as 7:2014cv02258
Plaintiff:
Samuel Allen Maestas-Kaufman
Defendant:
Bibb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
