Cases 31 - 40 of 1,971
Patrick McGail v. Bill Cool
as 23-3886
Petitioner / Appellant:
PATRICK A. MCGAIL
Respondent / Appellee:
BILL COOL, Warden
Halicek v. Collins et al
as 3:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Donald Halicek
Defendant:
Rosheem Collins, Steven White, Madison Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OUTMemphis et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv02670
Plaintiff:
OUTMemphis, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jonathan Skrmetti, David Rausch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Anthony Grose, Sr. v. City of Bartlett, TN Government, et al
as 23-5937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY T. GROSE, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BARTLETT, TN GOVERNMENT, Keith McDonald, Mayor - Bartlett Police Department (BPD), NICK BRAMLETT, In his BPD official and individual capacity, WESLEY WILSON, In his BPD official and individual capacity and others
Soulliere v. Little et al
as 2:2023cv12656
Plaintiff:
Madalyn M. Soulliere
Defendant:
Joel T. Little, Julianna Solomon, David Ward and others
Zelesnik v. GE Hall of Fame Inductees et al
as 2:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
GE Hall of Fame Inductees, Senator Mitch McConnell, Bill Laverty and others
USA v. Fabian Bills
as 23-5835
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FABIAN OBRYAN BILLS
Gerald Mangum v. Bill Lee, et al
as 23-5823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD MANGUM
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL LEE and DAVID B. RAUSCH
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
