Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Antoine Martin v. Roy Cooper
as 19-2196
Defendant / Appellee:
HERTFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, LT. MARTY DAVIS, Major, VERNON STEWART, District Attorney (District 11A) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTOINE D. MARTIN
David R. Corbin v. Judge Talmadge Baggett
as 17-1665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID R. CORBIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE TALMADGE BAGGETT, BILLY WEST, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, THE WILLIFORD LAW FIRM and others
John Doe #1 v. Roy Cooper, III
as 16-1596
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, #1, JOHN DOE, #2, JOHN DOE, #3 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROY A. COOPER, III, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, FRANK PARRISH, District Attorney, District 01, SETH EDWARDS, District Attorney, District 02 and others
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, Governor of the State of North Carolina
John Doe #1 v. Roy Cooper, III
as 16-6026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, #1, JOHN DOE, #2, JOHN DOE, #3 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROY A. COOPER, III, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, FRANK PARRISH, District Attorney, District 01, SETH EDWARDS, District Attorney, District 02 and others
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, Governor of the State of North Carolina
Gretchen Stuart v. Paul Camnitz
as 14-1150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD
Sylvester Harding, III v. R. Roush
as 13-7390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVESTER E. HARDING, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN R. ROUSH, LIEUTENANT D. BULLARD, CLAYTON RICHARD, U. S. Supreme Court and others
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD, GREGORY J. BRANNON, MD, CHIMERE COLLINS and others
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, M.D., in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., M.D., GREGORY J. BRANNON, M.D., CHIMERE COLLINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
