Cases 11 - 18 of 18
BINGHAM, et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, et al
as 1:2011cv01153
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH PEAKS BINGHAM and ALBERT LAMONT BINGHAM
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY , NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1968 CHEVROLET CAMARO DRAG CAR, VIN 124378N308008 et al
as 1:2010cv00854
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
1968 CHEVROLET CAMARO DRAG CAR, VIN 124378N308008, 1990 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS DRAG CAR, NO VIN, 26' CAR HAULER/TRAILER, VIN 4FPW53639TG013768 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
WEST v. BLANTON et al
as 1:2009cv00694
Plaintiff:
MELVIN ANTHONY WEST
Defendant:
THEODORE A. BLANTON, CHERYL H. HEARNE, KAREN BIERNACKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Bingham et al
as 3:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. and Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy Floyd Bingham and Kooligans Bar and Grill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
BINGHAM v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2009cv00041
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH G. BINGHAM
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kalafatas v. Peace College of Raleigh, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00360
Plaintiff:
Karen Rives Kalafatas
Defendant:
Peace College of Raleigh, Inc. and Laura Carpenter Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kalafatas v. Peace College of Raleigh, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00293
Plaintiff:
Karen Rives Kalafatas
Defendant:
Peace College of Raleigh, Inc. and Laura Carpenter Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bey v. State of NC, et al
as 2:2007cv00024
Plaintiff:
Fatema Bey
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, North Carolina Highway Patrol, Kevin Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
