Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Klyman v. Buncombe County Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Karen Klyman
Defendant:
Buncombe County Department of Health and Human Services, Stoney Blevins, Kody Kinsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bermeo v. Andis et al
as 3:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dyanie Bermeo
Defendant:
Blake Andis, Scott Snapp, Jamie Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blevins v. King et al
as 5:2022ct03064
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blevins and Tommy Ray Blevins
Defendant:
Danny King and Mr. Fornoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blevins v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Denver W. Blevins
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Kenneth Diggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Top Product Innovations, Inc. v. ISMS Ltd. et al
as 3:2021cv00484
Plaintiff:
Top Product Innovations, Inc.
Defendant:
ISMS Ltd., Dennis Bellafiore, Owen Blevins and others
BLEVINS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2021cv00015
Petitioner:
DENVER W. BLEVINS
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BLEVINS v. RANDOLPH COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00558
Defendant:
FRANK PERRY, RANDOLPH COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT, JACK CELLAND and others
Plaintiff:
DENVER W. BLEVINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. LivaNova PLC et al
as 3:2016cv00785
Plaintiff:
Van Sidney Blevins, III
Defendant:
LivaNova PLC, Sorin Group Deutschland GmbH and Sorin Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLEVINS v. PERRY et al
as 1:2016cv01208
Plaintiff:
DENVER W. BLEVINS
Defendant:
FRANK PERRY, NORA D. HUNT, OLIVER WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Thornton et al
as 5:2015ct03265
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blevins
Defendant:
Cynthia Thornton, George Blackmon, Jimmy Dorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
