Cases 31 - 40 of 153
Danenberg v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Danenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 7:2019cv00088
Defendant:
JACQUELINE BUNN, TERRY E BARNARD, BRIAN OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCEY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01987
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 1:2019cv00847
Respondent:
Georgia Board of Pardons, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, WARDEN JERMANE WHITE and others
Petitioner:
David Timothy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 5:2019cv00025
Respondent:
CHAIRMAN JAMES W MILLS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Petitioner:
DAVID TIMOTHY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2019cv00006
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles and State of Georgia
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daker v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOCKETT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
REGGIE LOCKETT
Defendant:
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOCKETT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2018cv00402
Plaintiff:
REGGIE LOCKETT
Defendant:
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
