Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Tucker v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2021cv60943
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416
Bankhead et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc et al
as 6:2020cv00690
Plaintiff:
Randal Childers, Stanley Dixon, Paula Cook and others
Defendant:
Big Sky Environmental LLC, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tucker v. FBI Headquarters et al
as 2:2019cv13626
Defendant:
Edward Leszynski, Benjamin Egron, Defense Advanced Resarch Project Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tucker
Amaniera et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12043
Plaintiff:
Philip Tomaselli, Rainel Valladares, Sanders Sainnoval and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Tucker et al
as 2:2018cv00150
Petitioner:
Nema Mobley, William Cagle, Dennis Robichaud and others
Respondent:
TDS Telecom Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4
Tyiska et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv11841
Plaintiff:
Patrice Tyiska , Bobby Tucker , James Taylor and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER , Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Tucker v. Claremont at Walden LLC, et al
as 16-35617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAREMONT AT WALDEN LLC, ASHLEY CHAN and SEATTLE OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS
Tucker v. Claremont at Walden LLC
as 2:2015cv00570
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tucker
Defendant:
Claremont at Walden LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Tucker et al v. Seattle Housing Authority
as 2:2013cv01566
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tucker and Z.T.
Defendant:
Seattle Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
