Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moss v. Jefferys
as 8:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Bobby S. Moss
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mead et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mead and Karrie Mead
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Fagan v. Kelly et al
as 4:2021cv03326
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Lynn Fagan
Defendant:
Sean Kelly, Ryan G. Normon, Michael Olkerbak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meints et al v. City of Wymore, Nebraska et al
as 4:2021cv03090
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mittan, Zachariah Borzekofski, Blake Pesetsky and others
Defendant:
City of Wymore, Nebraska and Wymore Emergency Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Hansen v. The City of Superior, Nebraska et al
as 8:2020cv00063
Defendant:
Carrie Lemke, The City of Superior, Nebraska, Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Otto Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith v. Faith Regional Health Services et al
as 8:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Stephen Smith and Faith Regional Health Services
Plaintiff:
Bobby Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Selegrath et al v. Ma & Pa Trucking, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00037
Defendant:
Ma & Pa Trucking, LLC and Sy Francis Koppen
Plaintiff:
Faith Selegrath, Bobby Selegrath and Bobby Selegrath, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Moss v. Frakes
as 8:2016cv00479
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner:
Bobby J. Moss
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
