Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Jakita Murphy v. Pamela Malott
as 23-2986
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jakita Murphy
Defendant:
Nurzuhal Faust, Warden, McPherson Unit, ADC and Cody Boggs, Cpl., McPherson Unit, ADC
Defendant / Appellee:
Pam Malott, Sgt., McPherson Unit, ADC
Simmons v. Tehum Care Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04149
Plaintiff:
Pati Simmons
Defendant:
Tehum Care Services, Inc. doing business as Corizon Health, Inc., Kavita Pendurthi, Mary A Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Capp et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marcum
Defendant:
Sarah Capp, Abby Yarbrough, David Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boggs v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Boggs
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell Teconchuk v. Steven Ricketts, et al
as 21-3428
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mitchell D. Teconchuk
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven Ricketts, Deputy Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC, Gary Mussleman, Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC, Brandy Elliott, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, ADC and others
Murphy v. Faust et al
as 3:2021cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jakita Murphy
Defendant:
N Faust, P Malott and Boggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Boggs
as 2:2021cv02108
Defendant:
Larry Boggs
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcum v. Stevens et al
as 2:2021cv02086
Defendant:
Attorney Sam Eastman, Len Bradley, Sara Capp and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Marcum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcum v. Stevens et al
as 4:2021cv00338
Defendant:
Ostendorf, Len Bradley, Sara Capp and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Marcum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weston v. Cochran et al
as 3:2021cv00057
Defendant:
D Lo Davis, Michael S Cochran, Justine M Minor and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
