Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Taylor v. Matter et al
as 2:2012cv01305
Plaintiff:
Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
W. Matter, Boice, J. Hostetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rocky Boice, Jr. v. Bill Donat, et al
as 11-17539
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROCKY NEIL BOICE, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
BILL DONAT, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Steven Reynolds v. Mark Metcalf, et al
as 09-35867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN CARLOS REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK METCALF, Sheriff, CURRY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., CITY OF GOLD BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Boice v. Phone Directories Company Inc et al
as 3:2009cv05340
Plaintiff:
Sherry Boice
Defendant:
Phone Directories Company Inc, Phone Directories Company Inc, Phone Directories Company LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Boice et al v. Phone Directories Company LP
as 3:2009cv05341
Plaintiff:
Sherry Boice and Victoria Ferrington
Defendant:
Phone Directories Company LP and Phone Directories Company LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
USA v. Richard Boice
as 09-50047
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD ALLISON BOICE
Steven Reynolds v. Curry County Sheriff Departmen, et al
as 09-35045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN CARLOS REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
CURRY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, MARK METCALF, Sheriff, ALLEN BOICE, Sgt. and others
T-Mobile West Corporation v Crow, et al.
as 2:2008cv01337
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile West Corporation, T-Mobile West Corporation, T-Mobile West Corporation and others
Defendant:
Michael M. Crow, Arizona State University, Arizona Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boice v. Donat et al
as 3:2008cv00199
Petitioner:
Rocky Neil Boice, Jr.
Respondent:
Bill Donat and The Attorney General Of The State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
