Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Logue v. Potts et al
as 4:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Clarence R Logue, Jr
Defendant:
Susan Potts, Drew County Jail, Mainline Medical Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graydon v. Maruf et al
as 4:2018cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Graydon
Defendant:
L Maruf, K Roberts, Bone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
Ron Davis, Williams Dawson, Michael Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bone v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, et al
as 6:2018cv06003
Defendant:
Juan M. Fuentes, Progressive Insurance Company, American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Bone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bones v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 2:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Rickey Bones, Sr
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bone v. Weeks et al
as 5:2015cv00384
Plaintiff:
Stephen James Bone
Defendant:
Benjamin Weeks and Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bones et al v. Phillips County et al
as 2:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Rickey Bones , Jr
Defendant:
Phillips County, Neal Byrd and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonee v. Smith Tire Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bonee
Defendant:
Smith Tire Inc, Smith Tire and Automobile Service Inc, Smith Tire Osceola LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Bonee v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv00407
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Sue Bonee
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Aaron v. Tidwell et al
as 4:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kameon Vankeis Aaron
Defendant:
Robert L Tidwell, Jr and Janice Bone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
