Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Mannie v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50160
Plaintiff:
Markus Mannie
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Andrea Tack, Jacob J. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 24-30049
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 23-30922
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Malone v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50348
Plaintiff:
William Malone and Bill
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonnett v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01700
Plaintiff:
James E. Bonnett
Defendant:
Warden, . and JCI, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Torres et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lagene C McGhee
Defendant:
Iris N Torres, Julie Capraro, Andrea Popp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrenz v. Brucker et al
as 2:2022cv01473
Plaintiff:
Michael J Lawrenz
Defendant:
Katrina Brucker, Ayedemi Fatoki, Josette Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonnett v. Zaken et al
as 1:2022cv01919
Petitioner:
Preston D. Bonnett
Respondent:
Superintendent Zaken, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoffmann v. Bonnett
as 2:2022cv01395
Plaintiff:
Anthony John Hoffmann
Defendant:
Denise Bonnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonnett v. Commissioner Of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00755
Plaintiff:
James E. Bonnett
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Corrections, Department Of Corrections and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
