Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Anne Marie Cronin v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc, et al
as 21-2085
Defendant / Appellee:
SUZETTE MITCHELL, BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC, LESLIE ESPOSITO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNE MARIE CRONIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv12642
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BANKS v. DISNEY et al
as 2:2016mc00650
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DISNEY, DISNEY RESPORTS, ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv03368
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, BARACK OBAMA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2014cv04569
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY , US COURT OF APPEALS 3RD CIRCUIT , JIM BRENNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. v. HARR et al
as 3:2013cv01460
Plaintiff:
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Defendant:
CARY HARR and MARIA-VICTORIA VELUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Fuqua School of Busine
as 10-4036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
Defendant - Appellee:
FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, MOIRA RINGO, SUNIL BALASAHEB PATIL and others
VURIMINDI v. FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
as 2:2010cv00234
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR R. VURIMINDI
Defendant:
FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, MOIRA RINGO, DOUGLAS M. BASHAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
