Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Howell v. Boston Police Department, et al
as 24-1129
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY and PLANET FITNESS
Howell v. Boston Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv13133
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Boston Police Department, Boston Public Library and Planet Fitness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lu v. Lima, et al
as 22-1085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee:
MELANIE LIMA and BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY, TRUSTEES
Defendant:
BOODIE UGNUMBA and G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lu v. Ugnumba et al
as 1:2021cv10516
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc, Boodie Ugnumba, Melanie Lima and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mopecha v. Knight et al
as 1:2018cv10494
Defendant:
Allen Knight and Boston Public Library
Plaintiff:
Taboh Penn Mopecha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lu v. Walsh et al
as 1:2015cv10920
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Martin J. Walsh, William F. Sinnott, Eugene L. O'Flaherty and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lu v. Menino et al
as 1:2014cv13053
Defendant:
Thomas M. Menino , Martin J. Walsh , William F. Sinnott and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Raja v. Hulme, et al
as 14-1181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDRA KARAN RAJA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HULME, OFFICER MCNULTY and OFFICER KELLY
Defendant:
ACTION FOR BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, INC., BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY, TRUSTEES, BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM, INC. and others
In Re: Raja
as 13-1576
Petitioner:
INDRA KARAN RAJA
:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Respondent:
BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
