Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Botanic Tonics, et al v. Pherson, et al
as 26-4060
Plaintiff:
BOTANIC TONICS, LLC and GLOBAL KRATOM COALITION, INC.
Defendant:
KELLY PHERSON, AMBER BROWN, BRADON FORSYTH and others
Botanic Tonics, LLC et al v. Pherson et al
as 2:2026cv00267
Petitioner:
Botanic Tonics, LLC and Global Kratom Coalition, Inc
Defendant:
Kelly Pherson, Amber Brown, Bradon Forsyth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Botanic Tonics LLC v. Leonhardt
as 2:2025cv00680
Plaintiff:
Botanic Tonics LLC
Defendant:
Kent Leonhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Botanic Tonics, LLC v. Outcast Distribution, LLC
as 2:2025cv07448
Plaintiff:
Botanic Tonics, LLC
Defendant:
Outcast Distribution, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Botanic Tonics, LLC v. Outcast Distribution, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv07449
Plaintiff:
Botanic Tonics, LLC
Defendant:
Outcast Distribution, LLC and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Pretrial Service:
Jeffrey G Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Torres, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al.
as 24-907
Respondent:
ROMULO TORRES and SAM ROSENFIELD, individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Petitioner:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
BOTANIC TONICS, LLC, NOWHERE PARTNERS, LLC and HYDRA623 HOLDINGS, LLC
Botanic Tonics LLC v. Shot of Joy LLC
as 2:2023cv10437
Plaintiff:
Bontanic Tonics, LLC and Botanic Tonics LLC
Defendant:
Shot of Joy LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
C.C. v. Botanic Tonics, LLC
as 3:2023cv04136
Plaintiff:
C.C.
Defendant:
Botanic Tonics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Botanic Tonics, LLC v. MIT Therapy, Inc
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Botanic Tonics, LLC
Defendant:
MIT Therapy, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Botanic Tonics, LLC v. The Bliss Bomb
as 8:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Botanic Tonics, LLC
Defendant:
The Bliss Bomb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
