Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Caldwell v. Bowers et al
as 6:2024cv06051
Plaintiff:
Samuel Walter Caldwell
Defendant:
Deputy Director Syrna Bowers, MEDICAL SERVICES MGR Dana Haynes, RN Kelly Aunspaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bower v. ADC et al
as 4:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Richard Bower
Defendant:
ADC and Freddy Childs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eastman v. Maloch et al
as 6:2023cv06100
Plaintiff:
Ramon Dewayne Eastman, Sr.
Defendant:
Abigail R. Maloch, Warden White, Major Maclor Otts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Bowers et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Latasha Roshelle Woods
Defendant:
Keith Bowers, Sherry Copeland, Sandy Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bower v. ADC et al
as 4:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Richard Bower
Defendant:
ADC and Freddy Childes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Markus v. Thyer et al
as 3:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Gentry Lee Markus
Defendant:
Cindy Thyer, Philip E Ferguson, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Bowers et al
as 3:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Matthew Corbett Lawrence
Defendant:
Keith Bowers, Marty Boyd and Hannah Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dambrosia-Shaw v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Zachariah Dambrosia-Shaw
Defendant:
Robert Wakefield, M Dukes and Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Mallory Lawson
Defendant:
Robert Wakefield, M Dukes and Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hales v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hale and Nathan Hales
Defendant:
Robert Wakefield, M Dukes and Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
