Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
SAWYER v. NUTTER et al
as 4:2022cv00140
Plaintiff: TRAVIS SCOTT SAWYER
Defendant: OFFICER NUTTER, BROWN, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. THOMAS et al
as 4:2021cv00020
Defendant: REBECCA REDDEN, CAROL MCCOLLUM, CECILIA THOMAS and others
Plaintiff: JASON JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTBROOK v. MILLER et al
as 1:2020cv03317
Defendant: MARK E. MILLER and BOWERS HARRISON INC.
Plaintiff: CURTIS L. WESTBROOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 lm
TAYLOR v. DIENHART et al
as 1:2020cv03110
Defendant: K. CUTCLIFF, PHIL BOWERS, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS AGENCY and others
Plaintiff: EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWERS v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2020cv00235
Plaintiff: STEVEN BOWERS
Defendant: VANDERBURGH COUNTY JAIL and DAVID WEDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 3:2020cv00205
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, FELLER and DAVID WEDDING
Plaintiff: STEVEN BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02584
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BOWERS v. ANTHEM, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00802
Plaintiff: MR LEE BOWERS and LEE BOWERS
Defendant: ANTHEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWERS v. G.E.O. CORP./INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03281
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Respondent: FERRELL OWENS, G.E.O. CORP./INC. and J. FRENCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOWERS v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00271
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?