Cases 21 - 30 of 2,612
Bowles v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowles
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FJerry, LLC v. Nautical Bowls Franchising LLC
as 1:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
FJerry, LLC
Defendant:
Nautical Bowls Franchising LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bowling v. Charger Logistics USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bowling
Defendant:
Charger Logistics USA, Inc. and Linda Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Haire v. 5445 Caruth
as 24-10137
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Haire
Defendant:
5445 Caruth Haven Lane Apartments Owner, L.L.C., Lincoln Property Company, Incorporated, Travis Bowles, in his capacity as Regional Manager of Lincoln Property Company, Incorporated and others
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
James L. Brown
Defendant:
Kemsy Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monzon v. Bowles et al
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Kemsy Bowles and Kevin Punturi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Demond Grant
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. doing business as AMF Bowling Lanes Savannah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bowling v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Zachary Bowling
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
