Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Bowling v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Harold Douglas Bowling
Defendant:
United States of America
Bowling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Melynda Bowling
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Benbow, et al v. Ingram, et al
as 7:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ms. Becky Lee LaSalle, Tyrance Drequan Benbow and Becky Lee LaSalle
Defendant:
Sheriff John W Ingram, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Brunswick County, Deputy Joshua Davies, Deputy Keith E Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kyre Mitchell
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Kerr Putney, Johnny Lee Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. The City of Charlotte, North Carolina et al
as 3:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Kyre Mitchell
Defendant:
The City of Charlotte, North Carolina, Kerr Putney, Johnny Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowles v. USA
as 5:2021cv00212
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrew Jonathan Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BOWLES v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00243
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brant v. NewRez LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00086
Defendant:
NewRez LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Melynda Leah Brant and Melynda Leah Bowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BOWLING v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2019cv00536
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
GARY WAYNE BOWLING
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
