Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Boyer v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv02269
Defendant:
Ennis-Wright, Jones, Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyer v. Williams
as 2:2020cv02249
Plaintiff:
Donald Boyer
Defendant:
Brian E. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gordon v. Unknown Party, et al
as 20-17296
Defendant / Appellee:
ENGLAND, Health Service Administrator, Tucson Arizona, BEHLE, Lieutenant, AUSP Thomson, Illinois, UNKNOWN PARTY, Medical Doctor, Coleman Florida and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Murrell v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00417
Defendant:
Arizona Attorney General, Centurion of Arizona LLC, Kevin Currin and others
Plaintiff:
Antony T Murrell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Glover v. Deer Ridge Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2019cv01602
Defendant:
Assistant Director Michael Gower, Mr. Read, Mr. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Darin A. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Frizell et al
as 2:2019cv00184
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Frizell, Unknown Huddleston, J Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. El Cajon Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Darnell Whitaker
Defendant:
El Cajon Police Department, J. Laroche (#342), A. Boyer (#349) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Ray et al
as 2:2017cv01719
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, S Boyer, Ronald Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale Frank Maisano v. Karen Barcklay-Dodson, et al
as 17-16258
Plaintiff:
CARL FISHMAN and KENNETH D. MEINHARDT
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN BARCKLAY-DODSON, Medical Director Doctor, ELIJAH JORDAN, Doctor; MD, UNKNOWN JACOBSON, Deputy Warden and others
Movant - Appellant:
DALE FRANK MAISANO
Geils v. Rasheed et al
as 1:2017cv00287
Plaintiff:
Andrew Geils
Defendant:
Karim Rasheed, Ning Lin, Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
