Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Proctor v. Roane County Commission et al
as 2:2019cv00432
Defendant:
Z. W. Hartley, S. A. McDonald, M. P. King and others
Plaintiff:
Brad E. Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Justice et al
as 2:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Jill Upson, Tom Takubo, Charles H. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Jean Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fisher v. Hall et al
as 2:2016cv12257
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Fisher, II
Defendant:
Lisa M. Hall, Brad Sommer, Vision Management Properties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv07388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Studli v. Children and Youth Services et al
as 3:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Sherry Studli
Defendant:
Children and Youth Services, Children and Youth and Families Central Regional Office, Judge John Cascio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
West Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc. et al v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2011cv00048
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc. , Keith T. Morgan , Elizabeth L. Morgan and others
Defendant:
City of Charleston , Danny Jones , Brent Webster and others
Movant:
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. City of South Charleston et al.
as 2:2008cv00289
Plaintiff:
Ivan H. Lee, II and Ivan H. Lee, II
Defendant:
City of South Charleston, Frank A. Mullens, Jr., Brad L. Rinehart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches et al v. Anderson V. Liberty Lobby Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Brad Huddy and Sprint Spectrum
Defendant:
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby Inc., Jack Anderson and Willis A. Carto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
