Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pickral v. Burns et al
as 3:2021cv00527
Plaintiff:
Lindsay M. Pickral
Defendant:
Esquire Stephen D. Burns, Brad Ellis Hawkins, Moen Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DaSilva v. Burns et al
as 3:2021cv00525
Plaintiff:
Enio DaSilva, Jr.
Defendant:
Esquire Stephen D. Burns, Brad Ellis Hawkins and Moen Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brewer v. May et al
as 3:2017cv00420
Plaintiff:
Lakendrick Brewer
Defendant:
Cody May, Brad Ellis, Donna Bassett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan Bribiesca v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves, an, et al
as 17-55098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN BRIBIESCA, M.D., C.C.P
Defendant - Appellee:
PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES, AND SAVITCH, LLP, a professional corporation, TIMOTHY SALTER, an individual, PAUL ANDREW TYRELL, an individual and others
Juan Bribiesca v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves, an, et al
as 17-55098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN M. BRIBIESCA, M.D., C.C.P
Defendant / Appellee:
PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES, AND SAVITCH, LLP, a professional corporation, TIMOTHY SALTER, an individual, PAUL ANDREW TYRELL, an individual and others
Bribiesca v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves, and Savitch, LLP et al
as 3:2016cv01225
Plaintiff:
Bribiesca and Dr. Juan Bribiesca, M.D., C.C.P.
Defendant:
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves, and Savitch, LLP, Timothy Salter, Paul Tyrell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Richards v. Newport Strategic Search, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
Timothy Richards
Defendant:
Newport Strategic Search Inc , John Fitzpatrick and Brad Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Scott County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2014cv00328
Plaintiff:
Ronald Calvin Thomas
Defendant:
Scott County, Mississippi , The Scott County Mississippi Sheriff's Department , Mike Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
