Cases 71 - 80 of 2,484
Otis Talbert v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 17-20615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS D. TALBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, SERGEANT JEFFERSON, R. M. GROTHEN and others
Finch v. Fox et al
as 5:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch
Defendant:
NFN Pharr, United States of America, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Kidd v. Brad Livingston
as 17-40912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS KIDD
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON
Wallace v. Hughes et al
as 4:2017cv02576
Defendant:
Lynn N Hughes, Ken Paxton, Brad Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Livingston
as 4:2017cv00645
Petitioner:
Wilson Emelsy Brown
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones et al v. Livingston et al
as 4:2017cv02335
Plaintiff:
Roy Jones , Alice Jones and Lequetta Davis
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Matt Barber, Joe A. Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Barroso v. State of Texas, et al
as 17-20433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD BARROSO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL MANAGED HEALTH CARE and others
Mitchell v. Livingston et al
as 4:2017cv01998
Plaintiff:
Wendell R Mitchell
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Matt Gross and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Horttor v. Brad Livingston, Executive Dir, et al
as 17-10711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY HORTTOR
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, L. GONZALES, Warden and others
Cuellar v. Livingston et al
as 9:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Alfred Cuellar
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Warden Wheat, Ashley Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
