Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Enforcement of Judgment
Bradshaw v. Oberlander et al
as 3:2021cv01618
Petitioner:
Tyler Bradshaw
Respondent:
Derek Oberlander and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRUNERMER et al v. ANDREASSI et al
as 2:2021cv00856
Plaintiff:
JANET BRUNERMER and SCOTT BRUNERMER
Defendant:
SCOTT ANDREASSI, BOROUGH OF APOLLO, BUREAU VISTA NORTH AMERICA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUELLER v. BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv00975
Defendant:
ERIN SELLECK, VIRGIL ROBERTS, DUTCH C ROSS, III and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BRADSHAW v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv05342
Defendant:
LISA DURAND, JOHN WETZEL, DORINA VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BRADSHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. MILLER et al
as 2:2018cv03333
Defendant:
SHARON MILLER, RLM INVESTMENTS, LLC, RUSSELL MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BRADSHAW v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE BRADSHAW
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
BRADSHAW et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05829
Plaintiff:
PHIL BRADSHAW and ROBIN JONES
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
