Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Herring et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03585
Plaintiff:
Harvey Herring, Abraham Alarcon, Alejandro Ramos and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv80430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
ADAMS v. Discount Muffler & Brakes
as 2:2026cv02426
Plaintiff:
NISHA ADAMS
Defendant:
Discount Muffler & Brakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Paessler et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2026cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Paessler and Stephanie Paessler
Defendant:
Troy Lee Jones and Hall's Brake Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TSE Brakes Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv01734
Plaintiff:
TSE Brakes Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Regal Beloit America, Inc. et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv00230
Plaintiff:
Regal Beloit America, Inc., Rexnord Industries, LLC, Thomson Linear LLC and others
Defendant:
United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
