Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dyer v. Mathews
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Brendan Patrick Dyer
Defendant:
Brandon Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemp v. Oakes et al
as 1:2021cv02932
Plaintiff:
Franklin Kemp
Defendant:
Rebecca Oakes, Alfredo Pena, Joe Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melnick v. Raemisch, et al
as 21-1330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUNTER ADAM MELNICK
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, KAYLA JOHNSTON, CPO, DEAN GONZALES and others
Mackey v. Hilkey et al
as 1:2021cv01226
Plaintiff:
Waldo Mackey
Defendant:
Darlene Alcala, Kristen Hilkey, Davis Talley and others
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER/ INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Waldo Mackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Belcher et al
as 1:2020cv03409
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson and Andrea Hodges-Johnson
Defendant:
Simon Byun, Fnu Pachoke, Brody Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed Jr. v. Transitional Counseling Service et al
as 1:2020cv02082
Defendant:
Joe Morales, Dawn (I) Conrad, Gayla Sykes and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Ray Reed Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Darnell Bryant v. Raybon C. Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv03459
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Sergio Montez, Kristina Estrada, Cori J. Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Darnell Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Polis et al
as 1:2020cv00857
Defendant:
Candace Werth, Jared (I) S. Polis, Daniel (I) W. Carr and others
Plaintiff:
David Robert Gray, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melnick v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2019cv00154
Defendant:
Karlene (I) Kelsch, Colorado Department of Corrections, Nichole Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
Hunter Adam Melnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pursche v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Pursche
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Randy Lind, Mike Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
