Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Breeden v. Eason et al
as 5:2024ct03087
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Breeden
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Eason, Correctional Officer Wargo, Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breeden v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023ct03307
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Breeden
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREEDEN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00617
Petitioner:
AL DEMETRIUS BREEDEN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lyon v. Breeden et al
as 5:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christina Bullard Lyon
Defendant:
David Woodfin Breeden and NFI Interactive Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Breeden v. USA
as 7:2023cv00913
Petitioner:
James Calvin Breeden
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rogers v. Glasco et al
as 5:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B Rogers
Defendant:
James Glasco, Glasco Trucking, LLC, K.L. Breeden & Sons, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rogers v. Glasco et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - See Case No: 5:22-cv-57-FL
as 7:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B Rogers
Defendant:
James Glasco, Glasco Trucking, LLC and K.L. Breeden & Sons, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DRUMWRIGHT et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rev. GREGORY B. DRUMWRIGHT, Edith Ann Jones, MELANIE MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF TERRY S. JOHNSON, Chief Mary Kristy Cole, JONATHAN FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeil v. Glasco et al
as 7:2020cv00133
Defendant:
K. L. Breeden & Sons, LLC, Glasco Trucking, LLC and James Glasco
Plaintiff:
Jasma McNeil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
